Commercial Water Conservation Case Study | Confidential Client

19.7% Reduction in Water Consumption

A commercial property installed a 4-inch AF valve to reduce water consumption and associated operating costs.

Following installation, water usage was analyzed using normalized billing data and a same-season, year-over-year comparison. The analysis measured a 19.7% reduction in water consumption, with peak monthly performance reaching 27.9%.

Results at a Glance

19.7%
Water Reduction

1.66 million gallons
Annualized Water Savings

$28,469/year
Annualized Savings

7.2 months
Simple Payback

Measured Results

Normalized water consumption decreased from an average of 894.5 CCF per 29-day period before installation to 718.3 CCF after installation, representing a 19.7% reduction in water consumption.

Based on measured performance, the results annualize to approximately:

  • 1.66 million gallons of water saved

  • $28,469 in annual operating savings

  • $2,372 in monthly savings

Post-installation billing periods recorded reductions of 15.5%, 15.7%, and 27.9%, with 27.9% representing the highest observed monthly reduction.

Project Details

Property: Confidential
Property Type: Commercial
Valve Size: 4-inch
Installation: October 8, 2025
Analysis: 17 billing periods
Normalization: 29-day equivalent
Methodology: IPMVP Option C / Whole Facility

The analysis incorporated pre-installation baseline data, prior-year seasonal validation, stabilized post-installation periods, and year-over-year seasonal comparisons.

Return on Investment

Based on utility-bill savings, the project generated approximately $2,372 in monthly savings and $28,469 in annualized savings.

The estimated simple payback period was approximately 7.2 months.

Based on the report's stated assumptions, the five-year analysis projects approximately $142,347 in cumulative savings and a 737% cumulative ROI.

Water Efficiency. Measured Results.

19.7% less water. 1.66 million gallons in annualized water savings.

Results are based on normalized utility billing data and the measurement and verification methodology documented in the case study. Individual results vary based on property characteristics, usage patterns, billing rates and operating conditions.

Previous
Previous

Multifamily Property Case Study 16.49%

Next
Next

Commercial Case Study 33.57%